Feedhive promises AI-powered social media management at creator-friendly prices. But for many users, persistent Instagram posting failures, removed Twitter integration, and unresponsive support make it worth exploring alternatives.
If you're researching Feedhive alternatives, you're likely dealing with one of these issues:
- Instagram integration failures: Posts won't schedule or publish, support doesn't respond
- No native Twitter/X integration: Removed in 2023, now requires manual API key setup
- Unreliable customer support: Critical bugs go unaddressed for weeks, refund requests ignored
- Constant bugs: Time-wasting issues beyond simple UI problems
- Platform limitations: Can't tag accounts, Meta integrations don't work for some users
- Pricing that scales quickly: Better for solo creators than professional teams
This guide compares 13 Feedhive alternatives across reliability, features, and pricing. Whether you need simple cross-posting automation, comprehensive management, or agency-grade tools, you'll find options that actually work.
Quick comparison: Top 13 Feedhive alternatives
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Key Strength | Feedhive Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PostOnce | Cross-posting automation | $19/mo | Reliable integrations | Similar price, no posting failures |
| Buffer | Reliable simplicity | $6/mo | Lowest cost, clean UX | Fraction of price, proven reliability |
| Hootsuite | Proven reliability | $99/mo | 250+ integrations | Established platform, no integration issues |
| Vista Social | Modern interface | $24/mo | User-friendly UX | Better UI, reliable posting |
| Later | Visual planning | $25/mo | Strong Instagram support | Instagram actually works |
| Publer | Budget all-in-one | $12/mo | Similar features, lower price | More affordable, fewer bugs |
| Agorapulse | Team collaboration | $49/user/mo | Responsive support | Support actually responds |
| Sprout Social | Advanced analytics | $199/user/mo | Enterprise reliability | No critical bugs |
| Hypefury | Twitter/X growth | $29/mo | Native Twitter support | Twitter works without API workaround |
| Planable | Team workflows | Custom | High user satisfaction (90%) | Better collaboration |
| Sendible | Agency management | $29/mo | White-label features | Built for agencies |
| SocialBee | Content recycling | $29/mo | Evergreen posting | Content categorization |
| Metricool | Free plan analytics | Free-$199/mo | Reliable free option | Better value for budget users |
Why consider a Feedhive alternative?
Feedhive has a 95% user sentiment rating and offers AI-powered features at affordable prices. But beneath the high rating, users report persistent issues that make alternatives attractive.
Instagram posting failures
Multiple verified users report Instagram integration doesn't work:
"It was impossible to post or schedule [on Instagram] and support never responded after being contacted."
Instagram is a critical platform for most social media marketers. When your scheduling tool can't reliably post there, it becomes unusable regardless of other features.
Twitter/X integration removed
In March 2023, Feedhive removed native Twitter integration when Twitter increased API pricing to $42,000/month. The official announcement stated:
"As you may know, Twitter has recently increased the prices for their API access. As a result, we have temporarily disabled our Twitter integration on FeedHive."
While Feedhive now offers a "bring your own API key" workaround, this adds friction. You need to:
- Set up a Twitter Developer account
- Generate your own API keys
- Add keys to Feedhive
- Hope Twitter doesn't change policies again
Many users prefer tools with native Twitter support that just works.
Unresponsive customer support
Support quality is a consistent complaint:
"Response times vary wildly and critical bugs sometimes go unaddressed for weeks."
"Difficulty getting refunds despite a 30-day guarantee, with the company eventually stopping responses."
When you're managing client social media or running your business, you need support that responds quickly and actually fixes problems.
Persistent bugs
Users report ongoing bugs beyond simple UI issues:
"Bugs that are constantly taking up your precious time."
"Tagging accounts on Instagram and Facebook was not possible."
"Software doesn't work with Meta, limiting posting to only LinkedIn."
For a paid tool, users expect reliability. Constant bugs erode trust and waste time you could spend creating content.
Designed for creators, not agencies
Reviews note Feedhive "feels more tailored to solo creators than professional teams" with "inconsistent AI suggestions across different brand voices" and "pricing structure that scales up quickly."
If you're managing multiple client accounts or have diverse brand needs, Feedhive's creator focus becomes limiting.
How I evaluated these Feedhive alternatives
I assessed each tool across five key dimensions:
1. Platform integration reliability Does Instagram posting actually work? Is Twitter natively supported? Can you tag accounts properly?
2. Customer support quality Do they respond to critical issues? How quickly? Do they actually fix bugs?
3. Pricing transparency and value Are costs clear? Does pricing scale reasonably? What features are included at each tier?
4. Target market fit Is it designed for solo creators, teams, or agencies? Does it match your use case?
5. Feature stability Are core features reliable, or do users report constant bugs and issues?
Let's dive into each alternative.
1. PostOnce — Best for reliable cross-posting automation
What is PostOnce?
PostOnce automates content distribution across social platforms with reliable integrations. When you post on one platform, it automatically syncs to your other connected accounts—no Instagram posting failures or Twitter API workarounds needed.
PostOnce vs Feedhive
| Feature | PostOnce | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $19-$49/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Instagram Reliability | Reliable posting | Users report failures |
| Twitter/X Integration | Native support | Manual API key required |
| Primary Focus | Cross-posting automation | AI-assisted creation + scheduling |
| Support Quality | Email support | Variable, often unresponsive |
Core Differences:
- PostOnce focuses on reliable cross-posting; Feedhive adds AI content creation
- PostOnce has native Twitter support; Feedhive requires manual API setup
- PostOnce emphasizes reliability; Feedhive has reported integration issues
- Feedhive includes more features; PostOnce does one thing well
Key Features
Reliable Platform Integration Connect Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, Threads, Bluesky, and more. Posts sync reliably without the failures users report with Feedhive's Instagram integration.
Cross-Platform Automation Content posted on one platform automatically syncs to others based on your rules. No manual reposting, no posting failures.
Content Filtering Set rules for what gets cross-posted. Filter by content type, hashtags, or platform compatibility.
Media Optimization Images and videos automatically convert to meet each platform's requirements. No manual resizing.
Real-Time Syncing Posts sync within seconds. Your audience sees content quickly across all platforms.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Eliminates repetitive cross-posting work
- Reliable integrations (no Instagram failures)
- Native Twitter support (no API workaround)
- Transparent pricing starting at $19/month
- Simple setup, no bugs reported
Cons:
- No AI content generation like Feedhive
- Focuses only on cross-posting (not full management)
- No advanced analytics or performance prediction
- Limited to content distribution vs comprehensive scheduling
Pricing
- Free: 1 social account, 10 cross-posts/month
- Standard ($19/mo): 5 accounts, 100 cross-posts/month
- Pro ($39/mo): 15 accounts, unlimited cross-posts
- Business ($49/mo): 30 accounts, priority support
All plans include content filtering, media optimization, and reliable integrations.
Verdict: When to choose PostOnce over Feedhive
Choose PostOnce if you:
- Need reliable cross-posting without Instagram failures
- Want native Twitter support (no API workaround)
- Prefer tools that work reliably over feature breadth
- Don't need AI content generation
- Are tired of Feedhive's integration and support issues
Skip PostOnce if you:
- Want AI-powered content creation and suggestions
- Need advanced scheduling features
- Require comprehensive analytics and reporting
- Prefer all-in-one management over focused automation
2. Buffer — Best for proven reliability
What is Buffer?
Buffer is the most-recommended Feedhive alternative according to G2 reviews. It offers simple, reliable social media scheduling without the integration issues plaguing Feedhive.
Buffer vs Feedhive
| Feature | Buffer | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $6-$120/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| User Satisfaction | 89% (3,755 reviews) | 95% (336 reviews) |
| Integration Reliability | Proven reliable | Instagram failures reported |
| Support Quality | Consistently good | Variable, often poor |
| AI Features | Basic | Advanced |
Core Differences:
- Buffer costs less ($6 vs $19 starting price)
- Buffer has 10x more reviews showing proven reliability
- Feedhive offers more AI features; Buffer focuses on core reliability
- Buffer's integrations work; Feedhive users report failures
- Buffer has simpler interface; Feedhive adds complexity
Key Features
Reliable Publishing Schedule posts across Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and TikTok. No posting failures, no API workarounds—it just works.
Clean Analytics Track reach, engagement, and clicks. Basic but reliable metrics without false data.
Browser Extension Share content to Buffer while browsing. Queue articles and images without opening the app.
Team Collaboration Share access with team members. Review and approve posts before publishing (paid plans).
Optimal Posting Times Data-driven recommendations for when your audience is most active.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Most affordable option ($6/month per channel)
- Proven reliability across 3,755+ user reviews
- Clean, intuitive interface
- No Instagram posting failures
- Consistently responsive support
Cons:
- Basic analytics compared to Feedhive
- No AI content generation
- Limited advanced features
- Team collaboration less robust than enterprise tools
Pricing
- Free: 3 channels, 10 scheduled posts
- Essentials ($6/mo/channel): Unlimited scheduled posts, basic analytics
- Team ($12/mo/channel): Collaboration tools, engagement features
- Agency ($120/mo): 10 channels, unlimited team members
14-day free trial on all paid plans.
Verdict: When to choose Buffer over Feedhive
Choose Buffer if you:
- Want proven reliability (89% satisfaction, 3,755 reviews)
- Need affordable pricing ($6+ vs Feedhive's $19+)
- Prefer simple tools that work over advanced features
- Value responsive support over feature breadth
- Are tired of Feedhive's bugs and posting failures
Skip Buffer if you:
- Need AI content generation and suggestions
- Want advanced analytics and performance prediction
- Require sophisticated team workflows
- Need white-label features for agencies
3. Hootsuite — Best for proven enterprise reliability
What is Hootsuite?
Founded in 2008, Hootsuite is a veteran social media management platform with 250+ integrations. It offers proven reliability without the integration issues affecting Feedhive.
Hootsuite vs Feedhive
| Feature | Hootsuite | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $99-$739/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Founded | 2008 (17 years) | ~2021 (newer) |
| Integrations | 250+ apps | Limited |
| Twitter Integration | Native | Requires manual API keys |
| Platform Reliability | Proven stable | Integration failures reported |
Core Differences:
- Hootsuite has 17-year track record; Feedhive is newer
- Hootsuite costs more but offers enterprise reliability
- Hootsuite has 250+ integrations; Feedhive limited to core platforms
- Hootsuite's platforms work reliably; Feedhive has Instagram/Twitter issues
- Feedhive more affordable; Hootsuite more feature-complete
Key Features
Streams Dashboard Monitor multiple social feeds in customizable columns. Track mentions, keywords, and engagement in real-time—no missing posts due to bugs.
Bulk Scheduling Upload CSV files to schedule hundreds of posts at once. Reliable bulk operations without failures.
250+ Integrations Connect Canva, Dropbox, Google Drive, Slack, and more. Extend functionality without platform switching.
Team Workflows Assign posts for review, approval workflows, permissions control. Organized team coordination.
Reliable Analytics Track performance across networks. No false engagement rates or missing data.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- 17-year track record of reliability
- 250+ integrations extend functionality
- No Instagram posting failures or Twitter workarounds
- Proven enterprise-grade platform
- Responsive support team
Cons:
- More expensive than Feedhive ($99 vs $19)
- Interface feels dated compared to newer tools
- Steeper learning curve
- No AI content generation
Pricing
- Professional ($99/mo): 1 user, 10 social accounts, unlimited scheduling
- Team ($249/mo): 3 users, 20 social accounts, custom analytics
- Enterprise (Custom): Unlimited users and accounts, advanced security
30-day free trial available.
Verdict: When to choose Hootsuite over Feedhive
Choose Hootsuite if you:
- Need proven reliability over cutting-edge features
- Want 250+ integrations vs limited platform support
- Value stable integrations (no Instagram/Twitter issues)
- Can justify $99+/month for peace of mind
- Manage professional or client social media
Skip Hootsuite if you:
- Need affordable creator-focused pricing
- Want modern, streamlined interface
- Require AI content generation
- Are a solo creator on tight budget
4. Vista Social — Best for modern, reliable interface
What is Vista Social?
Vista Social is a modern social media management platform emphasizing user-friendly design and reliable integrations—a direct response to tools like Feedhive with buggy interfaces and posting failures.
Vista Social vs Feedhive
| Feature | Vista Social | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $24-$199/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| UI/UX Quality | Modern, polished | Confusing per user reviews |
| Integration Reliability | Stable | Instagram/Twitter issues |
| Target Market | Teams & agencies | Solo creators |
| Platform Support | Comprehensive | Limited (no native Twitter) |
Core Differences:
- Vista Social emphasizes reliable, modern UX; Feedhive has reported UI/integration issues
- Vista Social slightly more expensive but more reliable
- Feedhive has AI features; Vista Social focuses on core reliability
- Vista Social better for teams; Feedhive tailored to solo creators
Key Features
Visual Content Calendar Drag-and-drop scheduling with clean, intuitive interface. No confusing navigation reported by Feedhive users.
Social Listening Monitor brand mentions, keywords, and conversations. Track what matters without missing data.
Reliable Publishing Schedule to Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, TikTok, and more. Platforms work without posting failures.
Team Collaboration Approval workflows, task assignment, and role-based permissions. Organized team coordination.
Comprehensive Analytics Performance tracking across platforms. Accurate data without false engagement rates.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Modern, polished interface
- Reliable platform integrations
- Good balance of features and usability
- Responsive customer support
- No reported posting failures
Cons:
- More expensive than Feedhive's Creator plan ($24 vs $19)
- Newer platform than Hootsuite or Buffer
- Less AI automation than Feedhive
- Smaller user community
Pricing
- Individual ($24/mo): 8 social profiles, 1 user
- Professional ($49/mo): 15 profiles, 3 users, social listening
- Advanced ($99/mo): 25 profiles, 5 users, advanced analytics
- Agency ($199/mo): 50 profiles, 10 users, white-label
14-day free trial available.
Verdict: When to choose Vista Social over Feedhive
Choose Vista Social if you:
- Want modern interface without bugs
- Need reliable platform integrations
- Value UX quality and stability
- Manage small team or agency accounts
- Prefer proven reliability over AI features
Skip Vista Social if you:
- Need AI content generation and suggestions
- Want lowest possible pricing
- Are solo creator on tight budget
- Require extensive third-party integrations
5. Later — Best for reliable Instagram support
What is Later?
Later is a visual-first social media scheduler particularly strong for Instagram—addressing Feedhive's persistent Instagram posting failures. If Instagram reliability matters, Later delivers.
Later vs Feedhive
| Feature | Later | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $25-$80/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Instagram Reliability | Strong (visual-first) | Posting failures reported |
| Visual Planning | Excellent grid preview | Basic |
| AI Features | Limited | Advanced |
| Target Market | Visual brands | General creators |
Core Differences:
- Later Instagram-focused; Feedhive multi-platform but unreliable Instagram
- Later offers grid preview and visual planning; Feedhive basic visual features
- Feedhive has more AI; Later focuses on reliable Instagram
- Later emphasizes visual content; Feedhive broader but buggier
Key Features
Visual Instagram Planning See your Instagram feed layout before publishing. Drag and drop to plan aesthetic. Preview grid shows profile appearance—no posting failures.
Link in Bio Create clickable landing page for Instagram bio link. Direct followers to multiple destinations.
Reliable Instagram Posting Schedule Instagram posts, Stories, and Reels without the failures plaguing Feedhive. It just works.
Best Time to Post Analyze when your audience is most active. Get recommendations for optimal posting times.
TikTok & Pinterest Manage visual platforms from one dashboard. Schedule video content and pins reliably.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Best visual planning for Instagram
- Reliable Instagram posting (vs Feedhive failures)
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Link in bio tool included
- Strong for visual brands and creators
Cons:
- More expensive than Feedhive Creator plan ($25 vs $19)
- Focused on visual platforms (less strong for Twitter/LinkedIn)
- No AI content generation
- Basic analytics compared to full platforms
Pricing
- Starter ($25/mo): 1 user, 1 social set, 60 posts/month
- Growth ($45/mo): 3 users, 3 social sets, 150 posts/month
- Advanced ($80/mo): 6 users, 6 social sets, unlimited posts
Free plan available with limited features.
Verdict: When to choose Later over Feedhive
Choose Later if you:
- Need reliable Instagram posting (vs Feedhive failures)
- Focus on visual content (Instagram, Pinterest, TikTok)
- Want visual grid planning
- Are visual brand, influencer, or creator
- Value Instagram reliability over AI features
Skip Later if you:
- Need AI content generation and suggestions
- Focus on text platforms (Twitter, LinkedIn)
- Want comprehensive multi-platform analytics
- Require advanced team collaboration features
6. Publer — Best for budget-friendly reliability
What is Publer?
Publer offers similar features to Feedhive at lower prices with fewer reported bugs. It's positioned as a more reliable, affordable alternative for freelancers and small agencies.
Publer vs Feedhive
| Feature | Publer | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $12-$100/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Similar Feature Set | Yes (scheduling, analytics, AI) | Yes |
| Bugs Reported | Fewer | Constant time-wasters |
| Twitter Integration | Native | Manual API required |
| User Reviews | Positive reliability | Mixed, integration issues |
Core Differences:
- Publer costs less ($12 vs $19) with similar features
- Publer has fewer reported bugs and issues
- Both offer AI, but Publer more stable
- Publer has native Twitter; Feedhive requires API workaround
- Similar target market (creators/small agencies) but better execution
Key Features
Multiple Workspaces Create separate workspaces for different brands or clients. Keep projects organized without confusion.
AI Content Generation Generate post captions with AI assistance. Similar to Feedhive but more stable.
Bulk Scheduling Upload CSV files or use bulk scheduler. Schedule many posts reliably without failures.
Auto-Posting Connect RSS feeds and automatically share blog posts. Reliable automation without bugs.
Comprehensive Analytics Track performance across platforms. Accurate engagement data without false metrics.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- More affordable than Feedhive ($12 vs $19)
- Similar features with better reliability
- Multiple workspaces included
- Fewer bugs and issues reported
- Native platform support (no API workarounds)
Cons:
- Interface less polished than premium tools
- Smaller user community than major platforms
- Limited advanced team collaboration
- Not as well-known as Buffer or Hootsuite
Pricing
- Free: 3 social accounts, 10 posts/month
- Professional ($12/mo): 5 accounts, 100 posts/month, 1 workspace
- Business ($29/mo): 10 accounts, 500 posts/month, 3 workspaces
- Agency ($100/mo): 50 accounts, 2000 posts/month, 10 workspaces
Verdict: When to choose Publer over Feedhive
Choose Publer if you:
- Want similar features at lower cost ($12 vs $19)
- Need reliable platform integration (no Instagram failures)
- Value fewer bugs over cutting-edge features
- Are freelancer or small agency
- Want native Twitter support without API workaround
Skip Publer if you:
- Need enterprise-grade analytics
- Want most polished interface
- Require extensive third-party integrations
- Need dedicated customer success manager
7. Agorapulse — Best for responsive support
What is Agorapulse?
Agorapulse is known for user-friendly workflows and—critically—responsive customer support. If you're frustrated by Feedhive's unresponsive support, Agorapulse offers a refreshing alternative.
Agorapulse vs Feedhive
| Feature | Agorapulse | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $49-$149/user/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Support Quality | Consistently responsive | Often unresponsive |
| User Experience | Highly intuitive | Confusing per reviews |
| Target Market | Agencies & teams | Solo creators |
| Integration Reliability | Stable | Instagram/Twitter issues |
Core Differences:
- Agorapulse has responsive support; Feedhive users complain of unresponsiveness
- Agorapulse more expensive but reliable; Feedhive cheaper but buggy
- Agorapulse agency-focused; Feedhive creator-focused
- Agorapulse emphasizes workflows; Feedhive emphasizes AI
- Agorapulse stable integrations; Feedhive reported failures
Key Features
Unified Social Inbox All messages, comments, and mentions in organized inbox. Tag conversations, assign to team members, track resolution—no missing responses due to bugs.
Responsive Support Team When issues arise, support actually responds and helps. Unlike Feedhive's reported delays and non-responses.
Content Calendar Visual calendar showing all scheduled content. Drag and drop to reschedule. Color-code by campaign or client.
Social Listening Monitor keywords and hashtags. Get alerts for important conversations.
Detailed Reporting Custom reports with engagement metrics and follower growth. White-label reports for agencies.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Responsive, helpful customer support
- Intuitive interface with organized workflows
- Reliable platform integrations
- Excellent for agencies managing clients
- Unified inbox simplifies engagement
Cons:
- More expensive than Feedhive ($49 vs $19)
- Less AI automation
- Still too pricey for solo creators
- Not as extensive features as Sprout Social
Pricing
- Standard ($49/user/mo): 10 social profiles, unlimited scheduling
- Professional ($79/user/mo): 20 profiles, social listening
- Advanced ($119/user/mo): 40 profiles, custom reports
- Custom ($149+/user/mo): Unlimited profiles, dedicated support
14-day free trial available.
Verdict: When to choose Agorapulse over Feedhive
Choose Agorapulse if you:
- Need responsive customer support (vs Feedhive unresponsiveness)
- Are agency managing multiple client accounts
- Value organized workflows and reliability
- Can justify $49+/user/month for quality support
- Want stable integrations without posting failures
Skip Agorapulse if you:
- Are solo creator on tight budget
- Need AI content generation features
- Want lowest possible pricing
- Don't need advanced client management
8. Sprout Social — Best for enterprise reliability
What is Sprout Social?
Sprout Social is an enterprise-grade social media management platform with no reported critical bugs or posting failures. If reliability matters more than price, Sprout Social delivers.
Sprout Social vs Feedhive
| Feature | Sprout Social | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $199-$399/user/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Reliability | Enterprise-grade | Bugs and failures reported |
| Support Quality | Consistently excellent | Variable, often poor |
| Analytics Depth | Advanced | Basic to intermediate |
| Bug Reports | Minimal | Constant time-wasters |
Core Differences:
- Sprout Social enterprise reliability; Feedhive plagued by bugs
- Sprout Social expensive but stable; Feedhive affordable but unreliable
- Sprout Social advanced analytics; Feedhive basic analytics
- Feedhive has more AI; Sprout Social has better execution
- Sprout Social for serious businesses; Feedhive for budget creators
Key Features
Zero Critical Bugs Unlike Feedhive's reported constant bugs, Sprout Social is enterprise-tested and stable. Platforms work reliably.
Advanced Reporting Custom reports with data visualization, competitor benchmarking, trend analysis. No false engagement rates.
Smart Inbox Unified inbox for messages across platforms. Assign conversations, add internal notes, track response times—works reliably.
Excellent Support Consistently high support quality ratings. When you need help, they respond and actually fix issues.
Social Listening Monitor keywords, hashtags, and brand mentions. Track sentiment and identify trends.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Enterprise-grade reliability (no critical bugs)
- Best-in-class analytics and reporting
- Consistently excellent support
- Stable platform integrations
- Intuitive interface with visual calendar
Cons:
- Very expensive ($199-$399 per user per month)
- Overkill for solo creators and small teams
- No AI content generation
- Price increases at renewal
Pricing
- Standard ($199/user/mo): 5 profiles, all-in-one inbox, publishing
- Professional ($299/user/mo): Competitive reports, custom workflows
- Advanced ($399/user/mo): Social listening, sentiment analysis, chatbots
Enterprise plans available with custom pricing.
Verdict: When to choose Sprout Social over Feedhive
Choose Sprout Social if you:
- Need guaranteed reliability (no bugs or posting failures)
- Can justify $199+/user/month for peace of mind
- Require advanced analytics and reporting
- Value excellent customer support
- Manage professional or client social media
Skip Sprout Social if you:
- Are solo creator or small team on budget
- Need AI content generation
- Want affordable creator-focused tool
- Can't justify enterprise pricing
9. Hypefury — Best for native Twitter/X support
What is Hypefury?
Hypefury is a Twitter/X-focused growth tool with native platform support—addressing Feedhive's removed Twitter integration that now requires manual API setup.
Hypefury vs Feedhive
| Feature | Hypefury | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $29-$99/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Twitter Integration | Native (core focus) | Removed, manual API required |
| User Satisfaction | 98% | 95% |
| Twitter Features | Advanced (threads, automation) | Basic (when working) |
| Other Platforms | Limited | 8 platforms |
Core Differences:
- Hypefury Twitter-first; Feedhive removed Twitter integration
- Hypefury native Twitter; Feedhive requires API workaround
- Hypefury has highest satisfaction (98%); Feedhive 95%
- Feedhive multi-platform; Hypefury focused on Twitter growth
- Hypefury for Twitter creators; Feedhive for general creators
Key Features
Native Twitter Support Post to Twitter without API workarounds. It just works—no developer accounts, no manual key setup.
Thread Creator Compose and schedule Twitter threads easily. Preview how threads will appear.
Auto-Retweet Automatically repost your best-performing content. Maximize reach without manual work.
Engagement Automation Auto-like, auto-comment features to boost engagement. Grow your Twitter presence.
Analytics Track Twitter performance with detailed metrics. See what content drives growth.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Native Twitter support (vs Feedhive's API workaround)
- Highest user satisfaction (98%)
- Twitter-focused features (threads, automation)
- No manual API setup required
- Built specifically for Twitter growth
Cons:
- Twitter-focused (limited other platforms)
- More expensive than Feedhive Creator plan ($29 vs $19)
- Not suitable if you don't prioritize Twitter
- Less comprehensive than multi-platform tools
Pricing
- Starter ($29/mo): 1 Twitter account, scheduling, analytics
- Premium ($49/mo): Instagram integration, advanced features
- Growth ($99/mo): Multiple accounts, priority support
Verdict: When to choose Hypefury over Feedhive
Choose Hypefury if you:
- Need native Twitter support (vs Feedhive's API workaround)
- Focus primarily on Twitter/X growth
- Want advanced Twitter features (threads, automation)
- Tired of Feedhive's removed Twitter integration
- Value highest user satisfaction (98%)
Skip Hypefury if you:
- Need comprehensive multi-platform management
- Don't prioritize Twitter/X
- Want AI content generation for all platforms
- Need strong Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook support
10. Planable — Best for team collaboration
What is Planable?
Planable is a collaboration-focused social media tool with 90% user satisfaction. It emphasizes reliable team workflows—a contrast to Feedhive's creator focus and reported bugs.
Planable vs Feedhive
| Feature | Planable | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Custom | $19-$299/mo |
| User Satisfaction | 90% | 95% |
| Collaboration Focus | Strong | Limited |
| Target Market | Teams & agencies | Solo creators |
| Reliability | High | Bug reports common |
Core Differences:
- Planable team-focused; Feedhive creator-focused
- Planable emphasizes collaboration; Feedhive emphasizes AI
- Both have high satisfaction, but Planable proven for teams
- Planable custom pricing; Feedhive transparent tiers
- Planable for agencies; Feedhive for individuals
Key Features
Visual Content Approval See posts exactly as they'll appear on each platform. Team members approve or request changes visually.
Team Collaboration Comments, feedback, and approval workflows built for teams. No confusion about who's responsible.
Multi-Brand Management Organize accounts by brand or client. Keep workflows separate and organized.
Reliable Publishing Schedule across major platforms without posting failures. It works when you need it.
Calendar View Visual overview of all scheduled content. Drag and drop to reschedule campaigns.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Excellent team collaboration features
- Visual approval workflows
- High user satisfaction (90%)
- Reliable platform integrations
- Built for agencies and teams
Cons:
- Custom pricing (less transparent than Feedhive)
- More expensive than creator-focused tools
- Overkill for solo creators
- Less AI automation than Feedhive
Pricing
Custom pricing based on team size and needs. Contact sales for quotes.
Verdict: When to choose Planable over Feedhive
Choose Planable if you:
- Manage social media with a team
- Need visual approval workflows
- Are agency managing multiple clients
- Value collaboration over AI features
- Want proven team tool (90% satisfaction)
Skip Planable if you:
- Are solo creator or freelancer
- Need transparent, affordable pricing
- Want AI content generation
- Don't need advanced collaboration features
11. Sendible — Best for agency client management
What is Sendible?
Sendible is purpose-built for agencies managing multiple client accounts. It offers features Feedhive lacks: white-label reporting, client management, and agency-focused workflows.
Sendible vs Feedhive
| Feature | Sendible | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $29-$399/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Target Market | Agencies | Solo creators |
| White-Label | Yes (reports, dashboards) | No |
| Client Management | Core feature | Not designed for this |
| Reliability | Proven for agencies | Bug reports for creators |
Core Differences:
- Sendible built for agencies; Feedhive for creators
- Sendible white-label features; Feedhive none
- Sendible client management; Feedhive basic workspaces
- Feedhive more affordable at entry level ($19 vs $29)
- Sendible proven reliability; Feedhive bug reports
Key Features
Client Management Organize social accounts by client. Give clients view-only access to review and approve content.
White-Label Reports Customize reports with your agency branding. Schedule automatic delivery to clients.
Content Approval Workflows Submit posts for client approval before scheduling. Track what's pending, approved, or rejected.
Compose Box Create posts once and customize per platform. Preview how content appears on each network.
Reliable Integrations Platform integrations work without the failures reported with Feedhive.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Purpose-built for agencies
- White-label reporting and dashboards
- Client approval workflows
- Transparent pricing ($29-$399/month)
- Reliable platform integrations
Cons:
- More expensive than Feedhive Creator plan ($29 vs $19)
- Interface somewhat dated
- Overkill for solo creators
- Less AI automation than Feedhive
Pricing
- Creator ($29/mo): 1 user, 6 profiles, basic features
- Traction ($89/mo): 4 users, 24 profiles, white-label reports
- Growth ($199/mo): 7 users, 49 profiles, client management
- Large ($399/mo): 15 users, 105 profiles, priority support
14-day free trial available.
Verdict: When to choose Sendible over Feedhive
Choose Sendible if you:
- Are agency managing multiple client accounts
- Need white-label reporting and dashboards
- Want client approval workflows
- Value agency-focused features
- Can justify agency-tier pricing
Skip Sendible if you:
- Are solo creator or freelancer
- Don't need client management features
- Want AI content generation
- Need most affordable option
12. SocialBee — Best for content recycling
What is SocialBee?
SocialBee emphasizes content categorization and recycling—posting evergreen content repeatedly. It offers features Feedhive doesn't: content categories and systematic recycling.
SocialBee vs Feedhive
| Feature | SocialBee | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $29-$99/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Content Recycling | Core feature | Not offered |
| Content Categories | Yes | No |
| AI Features | Basic | Advanced |
| Target Market | Systematic content creators | General creators |
Core Differences:
- SocialBee focuses on content recycling; Feedhive on AI creation
- SocialBee content categories; Feedhive basic organization
- Feedhive has more AI; SocialBee has better content systems
- Similar price range but different feature focus
- SocialBee for systematic posting; Feedhive for one-off content
Key Features
Content Categories Organize content into categories (promotional, educational, entertainment). Schedule categories to post in rotation.
Evergreen Recycling Automatically repost your best content at intervals. Maximize value from evergreen posts.
AI Content Generation Generate captions and post ideas with AI. Similar to Feedhive but within content category system.
Reliable Posting Schedule across major platforms without reported failures. Works consistently.
RSS Feeds Auto-share blog posts to social media. Keep feeds active with new content.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Unique content recycling system
- Content categories for organization
- Evergreen posting maximizes content value
- Reliable platform integrations
- Good for systematic content creators
Cons:
- More expensive than Feedhive Creator plan ($29 vs $19)
- Less comprehensive AI than Feedhive
- Learning curve for category system
- Not ideal if you don't want recycling
Pricing
- Bootstrap ($29/mo): 5 social profiles, 1 user, content categories
- Accelerate ($49/mo): 10 profiles, 1 user, audience analytics
- Pro ($99/mo): 25 profiles, 3 users, advanced features
14-day free trial available.
Verdict: When to choose SocialBee over Feedhive
Choose SocialBee if you:
- Want to recycle evergreen content systematically
- Value content categories and organization
- Need consistent posting without constant creation
- Have library of evergreen content to maximize
- Want more structured content system
Skip SocialBee if you:
- Create mostly timely, one-off content
- Don't want content recycling
- Need advanced AI features like Feedhive
- Want lowest possible pricing
13. Metricool — Best for free plan analytics
What is Metricool?
Metricool offers a genuinely useful free plan with analytics and scheduling—perfect for creators on tight budgets frustrated by Feedhive's $19 minimum and reported bugs.
Metricool vs Feedhive
| Feature | Metricool | Feedhive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free-$199/mo | $19-$299/mo |
| Free Plan | Robust (3 profiles) | Limited (no workspaces) |
| Analytics Focus | Strong | Basic |
| Reliability | Good | Bug reports common |
| Target Market | Budget-conscious creators | Paid creator tools |
Core Differences:
- Metricool has robust free plan; Feedhive limited free trial
- Metricool analytics-focused; Feedhive AI-focused
- Metricool better for budget users; Feedhive requires $19+
- Similar reliability issues less reported for Metricool
- Metricool for data-driven creators; Feedhive for AI-assisted creators
Key Features
Free Plan Actually useful free plan with 3 social profiles, scheduling, and analytics. No credit card required.
Analytics Dashboard Comprehensive analytics across platforms. Track performance without paying for enterprise tools.
Reliable Scheduling Post to Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, TikTok, and more. Fewer bug reports than Feedhive.
Ad Management Manage Facebook and Instagram ads alongside organic content. See complete picture.
Competitor Analysis Track competitor performance. Benchmark your content against similar accounts.
Pros and Cons
Pros:
- Robust free plan (vs Feedhive's $19 minimum)
- Strong analytics focus
- Reliable platform integrations
- Affordable paid plans ($18-$199)
- Good for budget-conscious creators
Cons:
- Less AI automation than Feedhive
- Interface less modern than some competitors
- Free plan limits (3 profiles)
- Not as feature-rich as premium tools
Pricing
- Free: 3 social profiles, scheduling, basic analytics
- Advanced ($18/mo): 10 profiles, enhanced analytics
- Enterprise ($49/mo): 25 profiles, team features
- Agency ($199/mo): 50 profiles, white-label
All paid plans include free trial.
Verdict: When to choose Metricool over Feedhive
Choose Metricool if you:
- Need free option (vs Feedhive's $19 minimum)
- Value analytics over AI features
- Are budget-conscious creator or small business
- Want reliable platform support
- Don't need advanced AI content generation
Skip Metricool if you:
- Need advanced AI content creation
- Want most polished interface
- Require extensive team collaboration features
- Need white-label features at lower price points
Which Feedhive alternative fits your needs?
If you're frustrated by Instagram posting failures
→ Later ($25/mo) or PostOnce ($19/mo)
Later specializes in Instagram with reliable posting and visual planning. PostOnce offers reliable cross-posting across all platforms at similar price to Feedhive.
If Twitter/X integration matters
→ Hypefury ($29/mo) or Buffer ($6/mo)
Hypefury has native Twitter support with advanced features. Buffer offers simple, reliable Twitter posting without API workarounds.
If you need responsive customer support
→ Agorapulse ($49/user/mo) or Sprout Social ($199/user/mo)
Both have consistently excellent support that actually responds and fixes issues—unlike Feedhive's reported unresponsiveness.
If you want similar features, fewer bugs
→ Publer ($12/mo)
Similar feature set to Feedhive at lower price with fewer reported bugs and issues.
If budget is priority
→ Metricool (Free) or Buffer ($6/mo)
Metricool has robust free plan. Buffer starts at just $6/month per channel with proven reliability.
If you manage agency clients
→ Sendible ($29/mo) or Planable (custom)
Both offer white-label reporting, client management, and team collaboration features Feedhive lacks.
If you want enterprise reliability
→ Sprout Social ($199/user/mo) or Hootsuite ($99/mo)
Both have proven track records without the critical bugs and posting failures affecting Feedhive.
Frequently asked questions
Why are users leaving Feedhive?
Users cite several key issues:
- Instagram posting failures: Multiple users report posts won't schedule or publish to Instagram, with support not responding
- Removed Twitter integration: Native Twitter support removed in March 2023, now requires manual API key setup
- Unresponsive support: Critical bugs go unaddressed for weeks, refund requests ignored
- Constant bugs: Time-wasting issues beyond simple UI problems
- Better alternatives: Tools like Buffer ($6/mo) offer similar features with proven reliability
Does Feedhive still support Twitter/X?
Not natively. In March 2023, Feedhive removed Twitter integration when Twitter increased API pricing to $42,000/month. Now you need to:
- Create Twitter Developer account
- Generate your own API keys
- Add keys to Feedhive manually
Many users prefer alternatives like Buffer, Hootsuite, or Hypefury that maintain native Twitter support.
What's the most reliable Feedhive alternative?
Buffer is rated as the best overall Feedhive alternative according to G2 reviews. It offers:
- Proven reliability (3,755+ user reviews, 89% satisfaction)
- No Instagram posting failures
- Native Twitter support
- Lower starting price ($6/mo vs $19/mo)
- Consistently responsive support
For creators needing cross-posting automation, PostOnce ($19/mo) offers reliable integrations at the same price point as Feedhive.
What's the cheapest Feedhive alternative?
Metricool offers a robust free plan with 3 social profiles, scheduling, and analytics.
For paid options, Buffer starts at $6/month per social channel—cheaper than Feedhive's $19/month Creator plan.
Publer at $12/month offers similar features to Feedhive with fewer reported bugs.
Which alternative is best for agencies?
Sendible ($29-$399/mo) is purpose-built for agencies with:
- White-label reporting and dashboards
- Client management and approval workflows
- Transparent agency pricing
- Reliable platform integrations
Planable (custom pricing) is excellent for team collaboration with visual approval workflows and 90% user satisfaction.
Can I switch from Feedhive without losing data?
Yes. Before switching:
- Export your scheduled posts (most tools allow CSV import)
- Download analytics history for records
- Document your posting schedules and content categories
- Test new platform with one or two accounts first
- Run both platforms in parallel during transition (1-2 weeks)
Most alternatives offer migration assistance, especially at agency and enterprise tiers. Contact support teams for help with data transfer.
Final thoughts on Feedhive alternatives
Feedhive offers AI-powered features at creator-friendly prices, but persistent integration failures, removed Twitter support, and unresponsive customer support create real problems for users managing social media professionally.
Choose PostOnce if you need reliable cross-posting automation at Feedhive's price point—$19/month with integrations that actually work.
Choose Buffer if you want proven reliability at lower cost—$6/month with 3,755+ reviews confirming it just works.
Choose Later if Instagram reliability matters—visual planning and posting that doesn't fail like Feedhive's Instagram integration.
Choose Publer if you want Feedhive's features without the bugs—similar functionality at $12/month with fewer reported issues.
Choose Agorapulse or Sprout Social if support quality matters—responsive teams that actually help when issues arise.
The right choice depends on your budget, platforms, and whether you need reliable integrations more than cutting-edge AI features. For most users leaving Feedhive, simpler tools with proven reliability deliver better results.
→ Try PostOnce free — reliable cross-posting, no Instagram failures, native Twitter support
Research sources
- FeedHive Pricing - Capterra
- FeedHive Reviews - G2
- Top 10 FeedHive Alternatives - G2
- 7 Best FeedHive Alternatives - Planable
- FeedHive vs Buffer Comparison - SelectHub
- FeedHive Reviews - Capterra
- FeedHive Twitter Integration Removed - X/Twitter
- 4 Tools That Stopped Twitter Integration - Publer
- FeedHive Review: Brutal Truth - Autoposting
- Top 10 Social Media Management Tools 2025 - FeedHive Blog